ross martin

January 25th, 2012 • Ross Martin

Scratch Launches Its Blog

Scratch launched a blog today.  I hope you like it.  Click here for my welcome letter, then check out the buffet of awesomeness posted by Scratchers.  We're just getting started…

January 22nd, 2012 • Ross Martin

Our New Long Range Plan, From Our Head of Strategy (First Draft)

January 22nd, 2012 • Ross Martin

Scratch At The 2012 Detroit Auto Show

I promised myself I would write down, at some point, what it felt like to sit in the crowd at the Detroit Auto Show and watch General Motors take its first huge (public) steps towards Millennials.

This isn't that post in a cogent form, but I can't help sharing how proud I am of my team for its groundbreaking work.  The results speak for themselves.  So much is happening so fast, I hope by putting a snaptshot down here I might remember what it felt like.  That simple. 

There, on the big blue stage, was GM's North American President, Mark Reuss, followed by Global Youth Marketing Head, John McFarland — our friends, partners and clients – explaining how the automaker's work with Scratch has informed design, engineering and marketing decisions across the company.

And there was Anne Hubert, who runs our consulting practice, up on the huge screen, championing the very generation that is right now transforming the auto industry, forever.

When I turned around to see if anyone was actually paying attention, this is what I saw:

Baller!  And my stupid bberry cam could only capture a fraction of the global press barrage.

Throughout the day, like a feed, friends and colleagues sent us links to all the press mentioning our work with GM, many with lines like GM gets help from MTV to woo millennials; GM built the concepts after interviewing high schoolers, college students and young professionals, with the help of MTV’s Scratch division, which targets millennials; and The design was done with the aid of MTV Scratch.

Here are but a few:

 

What's more, a slew of mainstream and auto media picked up on the dramatic shift in GM's approach, and celebrated it with headlines like:

  • “GM knows that striking a chord with the youngest generation of new-car shoppers—the under-30 crowd, or Millennials—is imperative for the brand’s future growth.”
  • “Chevrolet MyLink democratizes infotainment, coming to 2013 Sonic and Spark”
  • “Chevy aims for millennial market with two concepts”
  • “Chevrolet aims 2 concept cars at Millennials”
  • “General Motors takes aim at first-time vehicle buyers”
  • “Chevy's latest concepts — crafted by the kids” 

 

Yes, we're just getting started.  But I remember when Carlo DiMarco told me in an elevator once how sad it is that we don't take a moment to enjoy the moments.  Carlo, you were right.  Tonight I'm sitting here with a bottle of wine and a pile of insights on a generation I'm in love with.  Taking a moment to let at least some of this seep in.

January 20th, 2012 • Ross Martin

I'm On Pinterest Now

And it seems like we're all having fun there.  Just started mine HERE.

January 19th, 2012 • Ross Martin

The Future Of Swearing, Part 2: In Which A 2 Year-Old On "Modern Family" Curses

Didn't mean to time my post about "The Future of Swearing" this well, but let's go with it.  Last night's much-anticipated Modern Family featured little Lily, just 2 years old, appearing to curse.  ABC bleeped out the word, which wasn't "fuck," it was "fudge." 

Media shitstorms commenced.  Ratings, we'll see today, jumped.  And, as always, a new academic voice emerged to tell us why this might all be a good sign for our species.

Can we celebrate the awesomeness of mainstream media, for a second?  Two outstandingly funny angles:

First, propped up by Yahoo!, Timothy Jay, a professor at Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, actually argues that swearing is evidence of our evolution: "A lot of people don't realize that swearing represents an evolutionary leap, in that it allows us to be verbally aggressive without being physically aggressive," Jay said.  Yikes, Dr. Jay.

Next, the Associated Press managed to dig up 17 year-old McKay Hatch (awesome name!), who founded an "Anti-Cussing Club" in 2007 (when he was 14!). “Our main goal is to stop this from happening,” said Hatch. “If we don’t, at least ABC knows that people all over the world don’t want to have a 2-year-old saying the ‘F-bomb’ on TV.” Pure genius.

Lastly, in a sign of the intelligent design of the universe, just last week, the Supreme Court took up the issue of profanity on network TV. Good God.

Without further ado, here are the pirated clips of last night's Modern Family scenes in question:

Clip 1

Clip 2

Clip 3 (the best)

The future of this shit might be closer than we fuckin' think, bitches.

January 17th, 2012 • Ross Martin

The Future Of Swearing

 My team likes to joke about my obsession with language.  I curse too much when I'm excited, never met a pun I didn't try out and, as a writer, I would describe myself as a subtractive sculptor — I'm really good with the delete button.
 
On the cursing front, I'm trying to chill, but it's tougher than I anticipated.  Maybe that's because, shit, I use four letter words like they're punctuation marks.
 
Remember Robert Graves' book, "Lars Porsena, or The Future of Swearing"? Written in 1926, Graves' tongue-in-cheek treatise laments the decline of swearing and foul language in England and looks back with nostalgia at the glory days of oaths and blasphemies.

 

We spend an awful lot of time thinking about the future of technology, media, consumption.  But the future of language isn't something I'd given much thought to since grad school. 

Then I read two posts in Communications Futures, potential scenarios on the future of swearing, in which Rex Troumbley foresees some fascinating outcomes, and now I find myself thinking about the socioeconomic and geopolitical forces acting upon language.  And how that's gonna change shit, I believe, sooner than we think.

You can tell Rex had a blast with these: "The only disclaimer I’ll include is that the scenarios are not for the faint of heart or the easily offended…and that they were a hell of a lot of fun to write."

 

Scenario 1

(December 28, 2011 in Communications Futures)

This scenario represents a future in which the use of profanity has continued to grow along with the technologies which mediate communication over 50 years. 

Reverse Timeline:

  • 2060 Technological telepathy encourages the direct transmission of swear-images between individuals.
  • 2055 Research and development commences on military applications of cursing.
  • 2050 Swearing in virtual world causes changes in the physical world. First person killed by a virtual curse.
  • 2045 End of written language causes swearing to become an exclusively auditory and visual phenomenon.
  • 2040 Derogatory gender terms become focused on male gender. First use of Fatherfucker by the female United States president causes a scandal. Last book published using formal writing.
  • 2035 First AI begins cursing in a language entirely of its own creation.
  • 2030 Insult Competitions (flyting) recognized as an official Olympic sport.
  • 2025 As China and India become dominant world powers, English becomes suffused with Chinese and Hindi curses.
  • 2020 Publishing of slang dictionaries completely replaces production of formal dictionaries.
  • 2015 Overt and covert censorship causes an explosion of new curse-words.

(For more on how this could play out, with fuller narrative, click here.)

Scenario 2

If you managed to get through the first scenario, here’s the second which represents a future where regulation and control of language, proper and improper, has been the dominant trend for the last 50 years.

Reverse Timeline:

  • 2060 Creation of new words and destruction of old words practically impossible.
  • 2055 Each citizen required to use every word in their preferred language’s Complete Dictionary at least one time each year, including curse-words.
  • 2050 Standard English declared the official language in the United States. Other languages can be used, but the use of a Universal Real-Time Translator (URTT) required in all public areas. Each citizen must declare their one preferred language.
  • 2045 Foreign language teaching is considered unnecessary and programs are dropped from schools. Universal Translator created which only translates fixed foreign languages into Standard English.
  • 2040 The Complete English Dictionary is completed. Registration of permanent language preference is required of all U.S. citizens. Only one choice is available per individual.
  • 2035 The Department of English commissions research into mental methods of fixing language as well as to develop a universal real-time translator.
  • 2030 Congress passes laws which require the use of Standard English by all government employees. The Department of Language is established to review petitions for new word creation and to compile the Complete English Dictionary. Creating new words becomes taboo or sin.
  • 2025 In response to sentiments against Twext English, filtering and auto-completing technology is deployed. Creating new words, curse-words included, electronically is made impossible.
  • 2020 The rapid destruction of languages prompts an international response to preserve language structure, syntax, and identity by appointing linguists to fix language according to their use in the Human Language Project in 2015.
  • 2015 Linguists complete the Human Language Project, storing visual and audio recordings and texts in an online database.

(For more on how this could play out, with fuller narrative, click here.)